Back in February, I reported how Dem leadership in Sacramento apparently just wasn't all that into winning a 2/3rds majority this year.
Turns out 4 months later, not much has changed.
To review, thanks to redistricting and a new "open primary" system, Democrats have a realistic shot in 2012 at picking up the two seats in the Assembly needed to achieve a 2/3rds
Democratic super-majority and overcome obstruction from Republicans. Without that
super-majority, things will continue to deteriorate in Sacramento, with Democrats forced to make draconian cuts to education and the social safety net instead of finding ways to raise revenue to balance the California budget.
"California voter approval of the Democratic-controlled legislature slinks along between 9 and 20 percent in recent Los Angeles Times and Field polls," writes former state Senator Tom Hayden in the Nation magazine. "Despite Democratic majorities in both houses and control of all statewide offices, the Democratic Party seems chronically unable to deliver the minimum that voters want from their government: results. College tuitions keep rising, and college doors keep closing. School funding keeps declining. Wetlands and redwoods keep disappearing. Billions spent on mass transit do not reduce congestion and air pollution. To a disillusioned majority, all the Sacramento fights appear to be about slowing the rate of California’s decline"
Yet Democratic leadership and PACs donated over a million dollars to two
“incumbent” Assembly members running in super-safe Democratic districts while
virtually ignoring other seats in swing districts (source ca.sos.gov)
Mike Allen in AD10 (+35 democratic voter registration) and Betsy Butler in AD50(+33 democratic) together received 5x more money than Al Muratsuchi - a non-incumbent Democrat running in AD66 (+3 democratic) against two better-known and well-funded Republicans.
He has received no money from the California State Democratic Party, while Allen and Butler combined have received over a $100K.
Eric Bauman, Vice Chair of the California Democratic Party, believes it's a non-issue.
"Let's not get caught up in misunderstanding or distorting the challenge. Muratsuchi's race is a November race, not a June race - rest assured he'll be fully resourced in the general election."
Rick Jacobs, founder of the California Courage Campaign, disagreed, raising concerns that throwing resources at safe Democratic seats would
damage the CDP's credibility with grassroots activists.
"So
then comes the question as to why, given priorities statewide, the
leadership raises and spends hundreds of thousands of dollars in AD 50.
How does that inspire people to work hard and raise money for 2/3?"
Susie Shannon who serves on the Executive Board of the CDP Progressive
Caucus was similarly incredulous. "How do they expect to raise money from
the grassroots in the future if they are just going to whittle it away
on safe Democatic seats? Any way you slice it, the (money) spent on the
Butler primary could have been saved for the Marutsuchi general election
to defeat the Republican candidate, or any number of more productive
endeavors. I would rather see this money going to overtime pay for the overworked CDP staffers."
The question now is what happens after June 5th if "incumbent" Assembly democrats Butler and Allen end up running against "non-incumbent" Democrats in November instead of Republicans.
Will Democratic candidates facing Republicans in other districts be, as Bauman promises, "fully resourced"? Or will Butler and Allen continue to take the lion's share of Sacramento's and the CDP's pie?
"I would venture many thousands will be spent to support the candidates
endorsed by the CDP, and that includes Butler and Allen," said Bauman.
"The CDP and (Speaker John Perez's) priorities should be to make sure we have
2/3 majority so we could actually accomplish some important things like
generating revenue, " said Agi Kessler, a delegate to the California Democratic Party and chair of the Democratic Party of the San Fernando Valley.
Concerned that party leadership would waste money on Democrat-on-Democrat races throughout the state, Kessler and other democratic party activists circulated a petition at the CDP convention asking Assembly Speaker Perez to prioritize winning a legislative super-majority when allocating limited resources. They submitted nearly 300 signatures from fellow delegates.
"As of today we've received no response from the
Speaker or anyone in his office", said Kessler.
Monday, May 28, 2012
Monday, May 14, 2012
50th Assembly Race: Dirty Tricks (Not) Done Dirt Cheap
![]() |
| Campaign consultant Richie Ross and Betsy Butler |
In describing how candidates in districts with lopsided partisan registration used to be able to only have to worry about winning the party primary before coasting to victory in the runoff, the story uses the AD50 race as an example of how it's possible under the new rules for two members of the same party to square off not only in the primary, but in the November general election as well.
In the 50th district, Democrats hold a 52% to 19% registration advantage over Republicans, while nearly 24% of voters are unaffiliated.....(Candidates) Osborn and Butler have raised more than $600,000 apiece, and most observers expect them to face each other in the fall. Richard Bloom has raised $260,570 and (Republican) Brad Torgan, $425.
Osborn has sent out 10 political (mostly biographical) mail ads, starting in mid-April. Butler so far has sent three.
Ritchie Ross, who is Butler's (campaign) consultant, said he and the assemblywoman have "plenty of gasoline left in our tank" for the remaining three weeks of the campaign. He added that voters in primaries usually don't pay attention until then.
That statement from Ross is something to pay attention to. Why?
Because three weeks before election day is exactly when campaigns start going negative. Something Butler's campaign consultant Ross is famous for doing.
In a 2005 story on California campaign consultants, the LA Times had this to say about Ross:
Dirty Deed: Writes mailer falsely linking Richard Katz to Latino voter suppression in Orange County, when Katz had actually defended voter rights, 1998. Katz loses state Assembly race by 29 votes to Alarcon.
Quotable: "So am I as pure? No. Have I done my share of selling out? You bet. Have I done things that I'm not proud of? You better believe it." -- San Francisco Chronicle, September 2003.
The Book on Ross: Plays to win at any cost, both financially and ethically.
In fact, Ross' mailer for Alarcon was so inflammatory, Katz sued for defamation.
More recently, working as a consultant for CA State Senate conservo-dem candidate Jason Hodge in the SD19 (Ventura) race, he's tried to misrepresent Hodges' more progressive opponent, Hannah-Beth Jackson, as a proponent of off-shore oil drilling.
Endorsed by the Sierra Club and the California League of Conservation Voters, Jackson is considered an environmental champion. In the Assembly she was Chair of the Natural Resources Committee, Chair of the Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials Committee, and Chair of the Select Committee on Coastal Protection. She's repeatedly gone on the record as opposing oil drilling off the coast of California, even co-authoring a resolution asking the President to permanently ban any new offshore oil drilling.
Yet despite this, Ross has worked overtime to paint Jackson as pro-drilling by exploiting Jackson's roll in a complicated and controversial negotiation for the Tranquillon Ridge project, which would have allowed the construction of a new oil platform off the coast of Santa Barbara in return for millions in oil extraction taxes and the closing of 4 other platforms in the same area.
While the efficacy of that project is certainly up for debate, Jackson's intention was to decrease oil drilling, not increase it. Using it to say Jackson is pro-oil drilling is a blatant lie. One that Hodge and the campaign consultant he shares with Betsy Butler is more than happy to tell voters over and over and over again.
Unfortunately, we can expect no less in the 50th Assembly District.
I'm hearing rumors that Assembly Speaker Perez, alarmed by recent polling, is doubling-down on his investment in Butler, hiring canvassers and professional phone-bankers, as well as forcing his caucus members to cough up tens of thousands more to shore up Butler's campaign.
Expect that money to translate into a barrage of negative mailers. Osborn certainly does, recently sending out an email to supporters urging them to volunteer to help her get out the vote.
"Open primary, jungle primary, top-two primary -- whatever you call it, it means that we need every supporter on deck right now. In 26 days, the top two vote-getters -- either two Dems, or a Dem and a Republican -- will win the primary and head to the general election," wrote Osborn. "Our campaign's passion in the next few weeks will determine if I'm one of those two people. And, if I place #1, it puts me in strong position to win in November."
Absentee ballots started going out last week.
| Reactions: |
Thursday, May 10, 2012
BREAKING: SMRR Letter To Butler Says Rent Control Opponent's Endorsement Sows "Doubt and Mistrust" For Her Candidacy
Today, Santa Monican's For Renters' Rights made public a May 3rd letter they wrote to Butler in reaction to the candidate's press release touting the endorsement.
"This endorsement and your apparent enthusiasm for it will certainly sow doubt and mistrust for your candidacy among the renter voters of Santa Monica, West Hollywood, and West Los Angeles."
The letter is signed by SMRR co-chairs Patricia Hoffman and Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein.
SMRR letter to Betsy Butler
On April 25, Butler's campaign issued a press release touting an endorsement by the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles (AAGLA), a landlord and apartment owners lobbying group.
“In her first term in the state Legislature, Assemblymember Butler has demonstrated a genuine understanding of the challenges facing the owners and managers of rental housing in California and has always taken a balanced approach to dealing with legislation affecting the industry,” said the association’s Executive Director, James Clarke.
On its own website, AAGLA characterizes rent control as "socialized housing" and laments it was unable to stop this "disease" from spreading throughout the state in the 1970's. But it also celebrates a few notable victories - including the passage of Proposition 13, and its efforts to push through a vacancy decontrol law removing the ability of local communities in California to regulate rents.
In the mid 70s, when Howard Jarvis was our Executive Director and vaunted Tax Reform Campaigner, we passed Proposition 13. In the mid 90s, our Sacramento Lobbyist, Steve Carlson helped draft and pass the Costa-Hawkins Law that protects our members (allowing rent increases upon vacancies) and saving the businesses of countless owners in Santa Monica and West Hollywood and apartment owners across the state from the worst most unreasonable unfair rent control laws.
Rent control advocacy groups - including SMRR and the Coalition for Economic Survival (CES) - say AAGLA's endorsement ought to raise red flags for renters in the 50th Assembly District.
"AAGLA endorsements are based on the candidates they believe would be more supportive of landlord issues and will vote on bills of concern to them," said Larry Gross, executive director of CES. "They clearly believe that Betsy is a better candidate for landlords than (her opponents). This is a very important factor that tenants should keep in mind when they cast their ballots on election day in the 50th district Assembly race."
In an interview, Hoffman expressed particularly concern with a statement in Butler's press release that she “will work to ensure people throughout the 50th District have as many affordable housing options as possible and I look forward to assisting AAGLA in making sure this promise becomes a reality.”
"To say AAGLA creates affordable housing is a real misuse of the term, " said Hoffman. "AAGLA has never provided affordable housing for low income renters unless forced to by inclusionary housing laws."
SMRR has endorsed Butler's opponent Torie Osborn in the AD50 race.
Renters are the majority in the 50th Assembly District. In Santa Monica, renters make up 70% of residents, in West Hollywood it's 78%, and in Hollywood, the percentage of renters soars to 92%.
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
He Evolved
Sometimes a picture (or two) is worth a thousand words.
![]() |
| National Equality March - Washington DC - October 10, 2009 |
![]() |
| A lone Get Equal Protestor - USC campaign rally - October 22, 2010 |
"Never give in. Never give in. Never, never, never, never--in nothing, great or small, large or petty--never give in, except to convictions of honor and good sense. Never yield to force. Never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy."
- Winston Churchill
| Reactions: |
Betsy Butler Endorsement By Rent Control Opponents Raises Red Flags For Tenant's Rights Groups
Prominent tenant advocacy and affordable housing groups in the 50th Assembly District say Betsy Butler' endorsement by rent control opponents raises serious concerns about her commitment to protecting tenant rights.
On April 25, Butler's campaign issued a press release touting an endorsement by the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles (AAGLA), a landlord and apartment owners lobbying group.
“In her first term in the state Legislature, Assemblymember Butler has demonstrated a genuine understanding of the challenges facing the owners and managers of rental housing in California and has always taken a balanced approach to dealing with legislation affecting the industry,” said the association’s Executive Director, James Clarke.
On its own website, AAGLA characterizes rent control as "socialized housing" and laments it was unable to stop this "disease" from spreading throughout the state in the 1970's. But it also celebrates a few notable victories - including the passage of Proposition 13, and its efforts to push through a vacancy decontrol law removing the ability of local communities in California to regulate rents.
Rent control advocacy groups - including Santa Monicans For Renter's Rights (SMRR) and the Coalition for Economic Survival (CES) - say AAGLA's endorsement ought to raise red flags for renters in the 50th Assembly District.
"AAGLA endorsements are based on the candidates they believe would be more supportive of landlord issues and will vote on bills of concern to them," said Larry Gross, executive director of CES. "They clearly believe that Betsy is a better candidate for landlords than (her opponents). This is a very important factor that tenants should keep in mind when they cast their ballots on election day in the 50th district Assembly race."
SMRR co-chair Patricia Hoffman is particularly concerned with a statement in Butler's press release that she “will work to ensure people throughout the 50th District have as many affordable housing options as possible and I look forward to assisting AAGLA in making sure this promise becomes a reality.”
"To say AAGLA creates affordable housing is a real misuse of the term, " said Hoffman. "AAGLA has never provided affordable housing for low income renters unless forced to by inclusionary housing laws."
SMRR has endorsed Butler's opponent Torie Osborn in the AD50 race.
Renters make up the majority in the 50th Assembly District. In Santa Monica, renters make up 70% of residents, in West Hollywood it's 78%, and in Hollywood, the percentage of renters soars to 92%.
Interestingly, in Betsy Butler's current Southbay district, (with the exception of Marina del Rey and Venice) the opposite is largely true. In Redondo Beach half the residents are renters, in Torrance, only 44% or residents are renters, and in Manhattan Beach, only 35% rent.
"When it comes to rent control, she's acting as if she's running in her old district." observed one campaign professional not affiliated with the race. (Though not affiliated with any of the candidates, he asked his name not be used for professional considerations.)
Former West Hollywood City Councilman Steve Martin raised similar concerns in an op-ed he wrote for WestHollywoodPatch.com.
Butler’s touting of the Apartment Association endorsement reflects a tin ear to our local concerns that is probably a result of the fact that Butler is a South Bay politico", wrote Martin.
"For Betsy Butler, rent control may seem to be something of an esoteric or philosophical issue. But to many Westside tenants, rent control is a question of protecting our homes."
On April 25, Butler's campaign issued a press release touting an endorsement by the Apartment Association of Greater Los Angeles (AAGLA), a landlord and apartment owners lobbying group.
“In her first term in the state Legislature, Assemblymember Butler has demonstrated a genuine understanding of the challenges facing the owners and managers of rental housing in California and has always taken a balanced approach to dealing with legislation affecting the industry,” said the association’s Executive Director, James Clarke.
On its own website, AAGLA characterizes rent control as "socialized housing" and laments it was unable to stop this "disease" from spreading throughout the state in the 1970's. But it also celebrates a few notable victories - including the passage of Proposition 13, and its efforts to push through a vacancy decontrol law removing the ability of local communities in California to regulate rents.
In the mid 70s, when Howard Jarvis was our Executive Director and vaunted Tax Reform Campaigner, we passed Proposition 13. In the mid 90s, our Sacramento Lobbyist, Steve Carlson helped draft and pass the Costa-Hawkins Law that protects our members (allowing rent increases upon vacancies) and saving the businesses of countless owners in Santa Monica and West Hollywood and apartment owners across the state from the worst most unreasonable unfair rent control laws.
Rent control advocacy groups - including Santa Monicans For Renter's Rights (SMRR) and the Coalition for Economic Survival (CES) - say AAGLA's endorsement ought to raise red flags for renters in the 50th Assembly District.
"AAGLA endorsements are based on the candidates they believe would be more supportive of landlord issues and will vote on bills of concern to them," said Larry Gross, executive director of CES. "They clearly believe that Betsy is a better candidate for landlords than (her opponents). This is a very important factor that tenants should keep in mind when they cast their ballots on election day in the 50th district Assembly race."
SMRR co-chair Patricia Hoffman is particularly concerned with a statement in Butler's press release that she “will work to ensure people throughout the 50th District have as many affordable housing options as possible and I look forward to assisting AAGLA in making sure this promise becomes a reality.”
"To say AAGLA creates affordable housing is a real misuse of the term, " said Hoffman. "AAGLA has never provided affordable housing for low income renters unless forced to by inclusionary housing laws."
SMRR has endorsed Butler's opponent Torie Osborn in the AD50 race.
Renters make up the majority in the 50th Assembly District. In Santa Monica, renters make up 70% of residents, in West Hollywood it's 78%, and in Hollywood, the percentage of renters soars to 92%.
Interestingly, in Betsy Butler's current Southbay district, (with the exception of Marina del Rey and Venice) the opposite is largely true. In Redondo Beach half the residents are renters, in Torrance, only 44% or residents are renters, and in Manhattan Beach, only 35% rent.
"When it comes to rent control, she's acting as if she's running in her old district." observed one campaign professional not affiliated with the race. (Though not affiliated with any of the candidates, he asked his name not be used for professional considerations.)
Former West Hollywood City Councilman Steve Martin raised similar concerns in an op-ed he wrote for WestHollywoodPatch.com.
Butler’s touting of the Apartment Association endorsement reflects a tin ear to our local concerns that is probably a result of the fact that Butler is a South Bay politico", wrote Martin.
"For Betsy Butler, rent control may seem to be something of an esoteric or philosophical issue. But to many Westside tenants, rent control is a question of protecting our homes."
| Reactions: |
Monday, May 7, 2012
And Now For Something Completely Different: Behind The Scenes Photos From "Castle"
So, when I'm not hip deep in the muddy world of local/state/national politics, my day job is to make the world safe for television.
My current gig - the best I've ever had - is on the ABC-TV show "Castle". Tonight is the season 4 finale, so as a treat for fans and friends alike who wonder what the heck it's like to be behind the scenes of the show, here are a few photos I hope you'll enjoy!
Can't see the photos from your mobile device? Go to this link.
My current gig - the best I've ever had - is on the ABC-TV show "Castle". Tonight is the season 4 finale, so as a treat for fans and friends alike who wonder what the heck it's like to be behind the scenes of the show, here are a few photos I hope you'll enjoy!
Can't see the photos from your mobile device? Go to this link.
| Reactions: |
Sunday, May 6, 2012
As More Details Emerge, DA's Investigation of WeHo Councilman John Duran Comes At Inopportune Time for AD50 Candidate Betsy Butler
![]() |
| Betsy Butler and John Duran - April 16, 2012 |
As the LA Times reported yesterday, the LA County district attorney's Public Integrity Division launched into an investigation of city employee credit card use when supporters of Duran and challengers to an incumbent slate of City Council members filed a complaint during last year's contentious election campaign.
After a community activist made some of the expenses public last year, West Hollywood took away council members' credit cards and tightened controls on spending. The Times has since reviewed hundreds of pages of expenses accrued by Duran and other council members.
However, during the course of the DA's investigation, it cleared all the original targets of the complaint, then set it's sights on a new person of interest - former WeHo mayor and current council member John Duran.
West Hollywood Councilman John Duran charged dozens of meals to his city expense account, often multiple times a week. Over three years, he spent more than $7,000 at local restaurants, including at such upscale eateries as Cecconi's and Mirabelle on Sunset.....
David Demerjian, head of the district attorney's Public Integrity Division.....said Duran's expenses are suspect because state rules allow meal and related expenses only for "necessary city business." Expensing a meal when out of town on city business is permitted, he said. But it's not justified to regularly expense meals within the city, especially when guests are other city employees, he said....
Demerjian said the meal expenses of other council members "paled in comparison" to Duran's expenses.
As first reported in West Hollywood Patch and this blog, Duran responded to the investigation by setting up a legal defense fund and hiring a criminal attorney. He's the only person of interest in the probe to do so.
Yesterday, the City of West Hollywood released this statement regarding the status of the case:
"The City has been informed that the District Attorney has completed its investigation as regards the City and its employees and the City does not expect any further action by the District Attorney with respect to the City or City employees," continued City Attorney Mike Jenkins.
"The District Attorney has not informed the City of the specific allegations being made against Councilmember John Duran, so the City cannot comment at this point on the District Attorney’s inquiry."
The intense media focus on the DA's investigation comes at an inopportune time for one candidate running in the 50th Assembly District race, Betsy Butler.
Butler - a straight ally who only recently moved into the district to run for election there - has relied heavily on Duran to help sell her candidacy to the gay community in West Hollywood. Two of Butler's opponents are openly gay - West Hollywood resident Brad Torgen and Santa Monica resident Torie Osborn
Duran was the only West Hollywood official quoted in Butler's press release announcing her candidacy for the 50th Assembly district. As recently last week, he co-hosted a major West Hollywood fundraiser at the home of supporter Jeanne Dobrin.
![]() |
| WeHo Councilman John Duran draped across AD50 candidate Betsy Butler's lap at an April 29th fundraising event hosted by Jeanne Dobrin and John Duran |
In January, Duran, a key supporter of AD50 candidate Betsy Butler, infamously blew up at Butler's opponent, Torie Osborn, during the West Hollywood/Beverly Hills democratic club endorsement meeting after Butler lost the club's endorsement in a close vote.
![]() |
| Duran caught on video yelling at Butler opponent Torie Osborn |
Dobrin's motion led to a series of votes which ultimately resulted in Osborn walking away with the club's sole endorsement.
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Key Betsy Butler Endorser, WeHo Councilman John Duran, Facing Possible Charges in DA Credit Card Probe
![]() |
| WeHo Councilman John Duran draped across AD50 candidate Betsy Butler's lap at an April 29th fundraising event hosted by Jeanne Dobrin and John Duran |
West Hollywood Patch is reporting today that a key endorser for AD50 candidate Betsy Butler, WeHo City Councilman John Duran, has set up a legal defense fund and hired a criminal defense attorney after meeting with the district attorney's office regarding an inquiry it launched in 2011 about possible misuse of city credit cards.
West Hollywood City Councilman John Duran has set up a legal defense fund in the event the Los Angeles County district attorney’s office decides to file criminal charges against him for improper use of his city credit card.
The district attorney began an inquiry in March 2011 after information surfaced during the city council election campaign about possible misuse of city credit cards by City Hall employees. In late August, the district attorney then requested additional documents pertaining to Duran’s expenses as a city councilman. (Duran served as mayor from April 2011 to April 2012.)
Duran had charges for 128 meals from 2008 to 2010 totaling approximately $7,000.Patch is also reporting Duran hired criminal defense attorney George Bird to represent him.
“John Duran is an honest, decent public servant who at all times conducted himself ethically and within the bounds of the law,” Bird reportedly told Patch.
The probe was originally launched when WeHo resident Ed Buck reportedly filed a complaint during the heated 2011 City Council elections alleging that some incumbent Council members and their staff had racked up $13,000 worth of improper charges on city credit cards.
Community Activist Ed Buck
Local activist Ed Buck, who uncovered the documents after a prolonged public records request, said he is glad the DA is conducting the inquiry.
“Whether or not this rises up to the level of criminal charges, it’s wrong,” said Buck. “It’s ethically wrong. It’s morally wrong.”
Buck noted that there have been rumors about City Hall misuse of credit cards circulating for years, but no one could ever prove it.While the DA's initial probe included what Patch characterized as a "wide range" of documents from City Hall, in late August of 2011 the DA's office began to narrow their focus, requesting additional documents from Duran as well as two other city employees.
Duran is the only person of interest in the probe who's announced setting up a legal defense fund or hiring a criminal defense attorney.
In January, Duran, a key supporter of AD50 candidate Betsy Butler, infamously blew up at Butler's opponent, Torie Osborn, during the West Hollywood/Beverly Hills democratic club endorsement meeting after Butler lost the club's endorsement in a close vote.
![]() |
| Duran caught on video yelling at Butler opponent Torie Osborn |
Dobrin's motion led to a series of votes which ultimately resulted in Osborn walking away with the club's sole endorsement.
| Reactions: |
Monday, April 30, 2012
Volunteer For Assembly Candidate Al Muratsuchi Today!

Dear Friends and Neighbors,
The Democratic candidate running for the 66th Assembly District needs your help. Starting NOW, Al will need your help to talk with your neighbors and friends about his vision for California. The campaign will be calling voters and walking our neighborhoods every weekend between now and the June 5th primary.

Please call the campaign headquarters at (424) 237-8520 or email the campaign at info@alforassembly.com if you are able to join them to precinct walk and phone bank.
Their next precinct walk will be next Saturday. Please meet at their campaign headquarters at 10:00 a.m., Saturday, May 5th.
Al Muratsuchi's Campaign HQ
1673 Cravens Avenue Torrance 90501
(click here for a map and directions)
Together, we can change the way things work in Sacramento, but that change starts here by electing Al to the California State Assembly.
| Reactions: |
Friday, April 27, 2012
Wherein Betsy Butler Decides A Part-Time Blogger Is Her Main Opponent In The AD50 Race
So here's my question for Betsy Butler. At what point did you decide you were running against me, Marta Evry, a part-time blogger, and not the three other candidates whose names will appear on the June 5th primary ballot for the 50th Assembly District race?
Let's start with this post on Santa Monica Patch written by one of your surrogates which begins with this:
The 50th Assembly District was treated to a display of bullying last week: One of the candidates running against Betsy Butler's bid for the new district launched a prolonged attack against her campaign promotion.
Does the author link to candidate Torie Osborn's website? Or to the LA Weekly article about the 8,000 plastic baby bottles you dumped on district voters, an article which quotes candidate Richard Bloom as saying your team "is 'milking' her BPA legislation for all its worth."?
No, instead she links to an article I wrote about the environmental concerns raised by district voters regarding those 8,000 foreign-made plastic baby bottles.
Also, imagine my surprise when I heard my name mentioned in the KCAL-TV follow up to the same baby bottle story. Why? Because the "reporter" for the story never bothered to contact me. But he was more than happy to take your word for it that a part-time blogger was somehow able to bully (there's that word again) a sitting Assembly member with a war chest of half a million dollars.
Girlfriend, we need to talk.
This may be news to you, but this race isn't about me. And it's not about you. It's about the people of the 50th Assembly District, the people of California, and how we have to solve the awful, intractable problems that decades of political dysfunction, indeed malpractice, has brought to this state.
I have nothing personal against you, Betsy. I supported you in 2010 when you ran against Tea Party candidate Nathan Mintz (for anyone who's keeping score, I live in Betsy's current district) and I was grateful for your support of Debra Bowen in the Bowen/Hahn race last year.
But for a whole host of reasons I believe you made a poor choice in abandoning your current district to run in AD50.
Mainly because:
A) In choosing to leave your current district vulnerable to Republican takeover to run in another district where the registration advantage is so great, a democratic corpse could get elected, you've made it that much harder for the Assembly to reach the 2/3rds majority needed to break Republican obstruction in Sacramento.
B) You seem to have forgotten that voters like to make informed choices about who will represent them in Sacramento.
For better or worse, I find myself to be the only person writing about this campaign in a consistent and substantive way. Do I have a point of view? Absolutely. It is all out there on public display. But I think it also means I have to work twice as hard to make sure everything I write is accurate, sourced and backed up by the facts. Voters are already ill-served in this state by a news media unwilling to do even the most basic legwork to inform the public, and by politicians willing to exploit that weakness to their own advantage. I shouldn't be adding to the problem.
So this isn't complicated, Betsy. If you want me to stop writing "negative" (i.e.: accurate) posts about your campaign, then stop doing things like this:
So let me conclude with this - if you want to debate what I've written on policy grounds, I'm more than ready to have that conversation. I think that's exactly what voters are hungry for, and what they deserve.
Let's start with this post on Santa Monica Patch written by one of your surrogates which begins with this:
The 50th Assembly District was treated to a display of bullying last week: One of the candidates running against Betsy Butler's bid for the new district launched a prolonged attack against her campaign promotion.
Does the author link to candidate Torie Osborn's website? Or to the LA Weekly article about the 8,000 plastic baby bottles you dumped on district voters, an article which quotes candidate Richard Bloom as saying your team "is 'milking' her BPA legislation for all its worth."?
No, instead she links to an article I wrote about the environmental concerns raised by district voters regarding those 8,000 foreign-made plastic baby bottles.
Also, imagine my surprise when I heard my name mentioned in the KCAL-TV follow up to the same baby bottle story. Why? Because the "reporter" for the story never bothered to contact me. But he was more than happy to take your word for it that a part-time blogger was somehow able to bully (there's that word again) a sitting Assembly member with a war chest of half a million dollars.
Girlfriend, we need to talk.
This may be news to you, but this race isn't about me. And it's not about you. It's about the people of the 50th Assembly District, the people of California, and how we have to solve the awful, intractable problems that decades of political dysfunction, indeed malpractice, has brought to this state.
I have nothing personal against you, Betsy. I supported you in 2010 when you ran against Tea Party candidate Nathan Mintz (for anyone who's keeping score, I live in Betsy's current district) and I was grateful for your support of Debra Bowen in the Bowen/Hahn race last year.
But for a whole host of reasons I believe you made a poor choice in abandoning your current district to run in AD50.
Mainly because:
A) In choosing to leave your current district vulnerable to Republican takeover to run in another district where the registration advantage is so great, a democratic corpse could get elected, you've made it that much harder for the Assembly to reach the 2/3rds majority needed to break Republican obstruction in Sacramento.
B) You seem to have forgotten that voters like to make informed choices about who will represent them in Sacramento.
For better or worse, I find myself to be the only person writing about this campaign in a consistent and substantive way. Do I have a point of view? Absolutely. It is all out there on public display. But I think it also means I have to work twice as hard to make sure everything I write is accurate, sourced and backed up by the facts. Voters are already ill-served in this state by a news media unwilling to do even the most basic legwork to inform the public, and by politicians willing to exploit that weakness to their own advantage. I shouldn't be adding to the problem.
- Dismissing as "insignificant" a petition signed by hundreds of high-value core volunteers in your current South Bay district pledging to fundraise and organize against potential Tea Party opponents if you remained in the district. Instead, you abandoned your current constituents in the South Bay because you believed the democratic voter advantage in the new AD50 would make it easier for you to get elected.
- Accepting nearly $150K in donations from fellow Sacramento Assemblymembers while not donating one thin dime to the Democratic candidate who stepped up in the district you abandoned, even though that candidate is running against two well-funded Tea Party candidates - one of them a millionaire who ran a $750K self-funded congressional race against Janice Hahn.
- Intentionally misleading voters by calling yourself the district's "incumbent" even though your current district barely overlaps the new AD50 by 1 percent and you've never lived or worked within its boundaries. Or worse, claiming that Marina del Rey (where you own a condo) is actually part of AD50, which is what you told KCAL-TV "reporter" Dave Bryan, who dutifully reported that falsehood as fact.
- Thoughtlessly opening a campaign office outside the boundaries of AD50, then erasing the evidence, hoping nobody would notice.
- Calling yourself the "environmental" candidate while at the same time dumping at least 8,000 (and maybe as many as 30,000) unwanted plastic baby bottles on district voters.
- Highlighting your union endorsements while using union PAC money to buy those plastic baby bottles, bottles which you admitted were made in non-union factories based in Mexico, a country where the minimum wage is less than $5 a day.
- Touting an endorsement from AAGLA, a landlord lobbying organization which openly brags on their website that they and their past president, Howard Jarvis, were instrumental in passing Proposition 13 and Costa-Hawkins (a so-called "vacancy decontrol" law which made it impossible for cities to keep rent control restrictions in place on an apartment once it was vacated) and which calls rent control "socialized housing" that has spread across California like a "disease".
So let me conclude with this - if you want to debate what I've written on policy grounds, I'm more than ready to have that conversation. I think that's exactly what voters are hungry for, and what they deserve.
However, if you and your surrogates insist on playing the victim by equating me to multi-billion dollar oil and tobacco interests, good luck with that.
Because if you think a part-time blogger can bully you, how are voters supposed to believe you'll stand up to the actual bullies, the lobbyists and special interests in Sacramento who come knocking on your office door Every. Single. Day?
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
"Bottlegate" Blows Up Big In The 50th Assembly District Race
![]() |
| Torie Osborn literally cleaning up the mess her Sacramento opponent left behind. |
TORIE OSBORN MAKES GOOD ON HER PROMISE TO RECYCLE UNWANTED PLASTIC BABY BOTTLES
Candidate Torie Osborn made good on her promise to pick up and personally recycle Betsy Butler's Mexican-made plastic baby bottles for any voter who asked. Osborn and friends were at the Santa Monica Community Recycling Center early Tuesday morning unloading boxes of the unwanted bottles, carefully unwrapping glossy paper flyers from the plastic bottles and putting the materials in the appropriate bins.
"I said I wanted to clean up Sacramento’s mess with your help," quipped Osborn in an email to supporters, "Little did I suspect we’d have to start so soon."
Santa Monica Mayor Richard Bloom, another candidate running in the district, also couldn't resist piling on the puns.
"It's a gimmick that is cute, but wasteful. I don't think this is going to go over well with voters," Bloom said, referring to Butler's attempt to capitalize on her bill banning BPA from plastic baby bottles and sippy cups. "Her team is 'milking' her BPA legislation for all its worth."
BETSY BUTLER MAY HAVE PLANNED TO DISTRIBUTE UP TO 30,000 MEXICAN-MADE PLASTIC BABY BOTTLES
![]() |
| Butler shows off one of her famous baby bottles at a campaign event on Sunday (photo: Miranda Robin) |
"Foot soldiers dropped them off on 6,000 to 8,000 residents' doorsteps (by her estimate), a reminder of Butler's victorious bill to ban the dangerous chemical BPA in baby bottles and sippy cups, "Simone Wilson, reporting for the LA Weekly, wrote. "But we've got to admit this is some of the weirdest, not to mention wasteful, campaign paraphernalia ever to hit the Westside. BPA is scary and all, but so is feeding a baby with an unsealed bottle you found on your doormat."
8,000 plastic baby bottles is a fairly eye-opening number in and of itself. But now I'm being told by two separate sources that Butler's campaign may have actually ordered up to 30,000 of the Mexican-made plastic bottles.
While I'm still trying to get confirmation, the 30K number does make sense, considering a typical campaign mailing for a district this size is anywhere from 40,000-80,000 pieces.
Eight ounce Evenflo plastic baby bottles retail at a little over a dollar a piece, then of course there's the cost for the campaign fliers as well as the fee to hire canvassers to attach the fliers to the plastic baby bottles and drop them off at doorsteps all over the district. So even if she paid the wholesale price for the plastic baby bottles, the investment for Butler's campaign would have been substantial.
Veteran campaign managers I consulted put the price tag for such an operation anywhere from $15K-30K. Again, this is all speculative at this point, but campaign finance reports due in mid-May should tell the tale. And there's no word as to whether or not Butler will go through with distributing the remaining 22K bottles or just eat the cost due to bad publicity.
DON'T LOOK FOR THE UNION LABEL
By Butler's own admission, she knowingly chose to purchase thousands of plastic baby bottles from Evenflo, a company which makes their bottles in non-union factories based in Mexico, a country where the minimum wage is less than $5 a day.
The candidate claimed she had no choice, telling the LA Weekly, "The reason they're from Mexico is because California and the rest of country have been so behind" on banning BPA.
Actually, Butler did have a choice. She could have chosen to forgo the bottles and find another way to highlight her involvement in the BPA legislation.
There are practical reasons why it's so unusual for any democratic candidate running for elected office to knowingly use non-union materials in their campaign. Candidates aggressively seek out union endorsements, not just for bragging rights, but because those endorsements often come with hefty checks from union PACS, as well as volunteer labor from union members for GOTV efforts.
Butler, largely through the help of Assembly Speaker John Perez, has received more union PAC money from Sacramento and LA trade unions than any other candidate in the AD50 race. IBEW, ILWU, UFCW, and the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades are just a few of the unions which have donated tens of thousands of dollars to Butler's campaign.
One can only wonder how the membership of those unions must feel about their dues going towards the purchase of thousands of non-union foreign made plastic baby bottles.
So while most of the attention has been focused on the dumping of thousands of unwanted plastic bottles on one of the most environmentally conscientious districts in the state, the union issue could prove to be the next contentious, if less publicly visible, issue waiting in the wings.
Stay tuned for further developments..........
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Help These Fantastic Progressives Become Delegates To The Democratic National Convention
Dear friends and neighbors,
Come out to vote for these amazing activists so they can become California delegates to the Democratic National Convention in August. These folks have worked their tails off to elect President Obama in 2008 and on issues we all care about in California. Please take an hour to return the favor and come to Santa Monica on Sunday to cast a vote.
WOMEN (VOTE FOR ALL 4)
Gloria ALLRED
Deirdre LIGHTFOOT
Susan SHANNON
Diane WALLACE
MEN (VOTE FOR ALL 3)
Dante ATKINS
Max KANIN
Anthony SALVAGGIO
WHERE
Bergamot Station Art Center
James Gray Gallery
2525 Michigan Ave, D4
Santa Monica, CA 90404
WHEN
Sunday, April 29
2:00-3:00pm
- All attendees in line by 3:00pm will be allowed to register and vote.
- You must be a registered Democrat in the new 33rd CD (click here to see map) to vote.
- You are allowed to register and/or change party affiliations right before you vote.
- Just cast a ballot and leave. You don't have to stay for the candidate speeches which start at 3pm
NOT SURE IF YOU LIVE IN THE NEW 33RD CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT?
CLICK ON THIS MAP TO FIND OUT.
The Fighting 33rd Congressional District includes parts of West LA, Hollywood, Beverly Hills, Santa Monica, Malibu, Agoura Hills, Manhattan Beach, Calabassas, El Segundo, Redondo Beach, Hermosa Beach, Torrance (west of Hawthorne Boulevard), Palos Vedes Estates, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, and unincorporated West Los Angeles County.
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)













